Think I'll give it a go at the weekend.
^top
I thought this was a really good film. Wasn't bored by any of it.
Not as good as the Goblet of Fire but miles better than the first two and I'd place it ahead of the third.
The giant looked a bit shit but that's just a small gripe. The adult actors are all marvellous especially Imelda Staunton as the new baddie, totally boo-hiss-able.
The kids are as always, just child actors, they're fine.
I give it 3.5, possibly 4, stars
Edited Sat 21 Jul 2007 at 12:11pm
^top
A really god film? Didn't know you were that way inclined Art
^top
*ahem*
picky
picky
picky ...
^top
I thought that it was the best film so far. It was much darker and much more interesting.
Finally Radcliffe managed to put in a great performance, and for the first time Sir Michael Gambon shined as Dumbledore.
Top performances for me were by Imelda Staunton, as Umbridge, and Grint who is constantly funny as Ron
^top
ArthurP wrote:
I thought this was a really good film. Wasn't bored by any of it.
Not as good as the Goblet of Fire but miles better than the first two and I'd place it ahead of the third.
I hated Goblet of Fire, I can undersyand that they cannot stick totally to the books but GOF just seemed to ignore them completely
^top
The Making Of, interactive games and additional scenes look interesting enough, but kids need only apply. Did anyone else see it in the end?
Read this review
^top
I've just watched this today having missed it at the piccies - the 2 1/4 hrs flew past so I guess that means I must have really enjoyed it - didn't feel boring at all.
What shocked me was the old clip of the Mirror of Erised - Daniel looked soooooo young, you don't realise how much he's grown up since then!
Gets my thumbs up but then I'm a bit of a fan so it probably doesn't count :)
^top
