Quieten down.... this isn't Manchester after a football game.
Do any of you children have an inkling of what the answer may be... you with the hand up...
^top
Barcode wrote:
. you with the hand up...
you talking to me?
^top
Barcode wrote:
tuff wrote:
Barcode wrote:
. you with the hand up...
you talking to me?
Is your hand up?
*removes rubber glove*
Not any more, miss.
^top
Please wash that.
Ok does anyone know the answer?
^top
Barcode wrote:
Please wash that.
Ok does anyone know the answer?
7?
^top
you've spent too long on the question and have no class control, I'll join richy in asking for your resignation :p
^top
tuff wrote:
Barcode wrote:
Please wash that.
Ok does anyone know the answer?
7?
Do you have a problem with putting your hand up? Was the question 'does anyone know the answer?'? I think you will find it was.
Write on the board 100 times 'I must listen when teacher is aksing a question'
Class.... Tuff was quite right the answer is 7.
3500 to 500 is as 49 to 7.
^top
Barcode wrote:
You have 49 apples and want to reduce it to the rate of 3500 to 500... how many apples do you now have and what is your working?
There's 49 apples.
You reduce this by an arbitrary rate of 3500 to 500. Lets make an assumption this means apples per second.
*raises type mismatch error
**has spent all morning fixing c++ code that he broke
Remedial computer test:
What would be the main problem of the following class
class Foo {
public:
Foo() { p = new int; }
~Foo() { delete p; }
Foo& operator=(Foo& rFoo) { delete p; p = rFoo.p; }
private:
int* p;
};
^top